Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612332›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2025

In-ovo imaging using ostrich eggs: biodistribution of F-18-FDG in ostrich embryos.

Thomas Winkens, Pauline Schweitzer, Olga Perkas, Christian Kühnel, Ferdinand Ndum, Marta Pomraenke, Julia Greiser, Martin Freesmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas WinkensClinic of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Pauline SchweitzerClinic of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Olga PerkasClinic of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Christian KühnelClinic of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Ferdinand NdumClinic of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Marta PomraenkeClinic of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Julia GreiserClinic of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Martin FreesmeyerClinic of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-ovo imaging using ostrich eggs has been described as an alternative to animal testing using rodents. This approach is not considered an animal experiment and it does not require small-animal imaging devices as ostrich eggs provide good image quality on regular CT, MRI or PET used in humans. The aims of this study were 1) to describe methods of radiopharmaceutical injection, 2) to explore normal biodistribution of F-18-FDG during a 60-min list-mode-PET/CT examination and 3) to compare biodistribution in-ovo to existing literature considering chicken and rodents. Vessel access was successful in 54/78 ostrich eggs. Highest FDG-uptake was observed in epiphyseal plates (0.36 ± 0.06 IA%/g; range 0.29-0.48 IA%/g) and brain (0.25 ± 0.05 IA%/g; range 0.21-0.36 IA%/g).

Indexed as

Embryo, NonmammalianFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsStruthioniformesAnimalsPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTissue DistributionFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticalsanimal modelglucose metabolismin-ovo imagingostrich eggspreclinical imaging

Identifiers

PMID40612332
PMCPMC12222030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.