Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612329›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Position Paper of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT) on the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears.

Pietro S Randelli, Mattia Radici, Alfonso Liccardi, Michele Cavaciocchi, Antonio Padolino, Paolo Fici, Federico A Grassi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pietro S RandelliLaboratory of Applied Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Mattia RadiciU.O.C. 1° Clinica Ortopedica, ASST G. Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy.
Alfonso LiccardiShoulder Surgery Unit, Humanitas San Pio X, Milan, Italy.
Michele CavaciocchiInstitute Ortopedico Rizzoli di Bologna, Ospedale di Argenta (FE), Bologna, Italy.
Antonio PadolinoU.O. Chirurgia della Spalla, Ospedale "D. Cervesi" Cattolica (RN), AUSL della Romagna, Cattolica, Italy.
Paolo FiciUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Federico A GrassiDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are a common condition, particularly among the aging population, and the choice of treatment depends on various factors. There is extensive literature on their management, but still no consensus given all the evidence. Purpose: To provide guidance on the indications for nonoperative or surgical treatment for RCTs. Study Design: Narrative review. Methods: Research of the literature on this topic was performed and articles were analyzed to draw up guidelines. A rating group of professionals specializing in shoulder pathology reviewed the results and integrated them with their clinical experience. Results: It is widely accepted that nonoperative treatment is typically recommended for degenerative tears. Surgical repair is suggested for traumatic tears, degenerative tears unresponsive to nonoperative treatment, and young and active patients with high functional demands. The choice of surgical technique depends on the surgeon's preference.The Società Italiana di Ortopedia e Traumatologia (Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology) emphasizes the importance of patient evaluation in determining the most appropriate treatment for RCTs. Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment is the first-line choice of treatment in the case of degenerative tears, while in the remaining cases surgical treatment must be considered from the beginning.

Indexed as

arthroscopyconservative treatmentrotator cuff tearsurgical indication

Identifiers

PMID40612329
PMCPMC12214392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.