Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612261›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

An explainable AI-based hybrid machine learning model for interpretability and enhanced crop yield prediction.

Anuradha Yenkikar, Ved Prakash Mishra, Manish Bali, Tabassum Ara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anuradha YenkikarSchool of Engineering, Amity University Dubai Campus, Dubai, 25314, UAE.
Ved Prakash MishraSchool of Engineering, Amity University Dubai Campus, Dubai, 25314, UAE.
Manish BaliSchool of Engineering, Amity University Dubai Campus, Dubai, 25314, UAE.
Tabassum AraDepartment of AI/ML, HKBK College of Engineering, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture is a major contributor to India's GDP and employs a large population. Key crops like rice are essential for food security, making higher yields crucial for sustainability. The use of machine learning (ML) in crop yield prediction has significantly improved forecast accuracy. However, the adoption of these models by policymakers and farmers is hindered by their lack of interpretability. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques address this challenge by making AI-driven predictions more transparent, ensuring trust and better decision-making. This research integrates XAI techniques into a hybrid model that combines the powers of Random Forest (RF), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and XGBoost algorithms by incorporating SHAP (SHapley Additive Explanations), LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations), and Counterfactual Analysis for yield prediction. On a large-scale, multi-year agricultural dataset comprising over 246,000 records across 33 states, spanning crops, seasons, and climatic factors provided by the Indian Agriculture Department, the model achieved high accuracy (R² = 0.9827 for crop yield and 0.9721 for rice yield) outperforming existing models. The method involves:•Implementing a hybrid AI model to improve accuracy in yield predictions.•Integrating XAI methods to enhance model transparency and interpret nuanced feature interactions•Delivering actionable insights via the developed 'E-Kisan' web interface.

Indexed as

Explainable AIExplainable AI (XAI) based Hybrid ML modelHybrid modelLocal interpretable model-agnostic explanationsLong short-term memoryRandom forestSHapley Additive explanationsXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40612261
PMCPMC12226059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.