ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Digitalising behavioural data collection through cloud-based technology in veterinary science and beyond.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Field data collection in veterinary and animal behaviour science often faces practical limitations, including time constraints, restricted resources, and difficulties integrating high-quality data capture into real-world clinical workflows. This paper highlights the need for flexible, efficient, and standardised digital solutions that facilitate the collection of multimodal behavioural data in real-world settings. We present a case example using PetsDataLab, a novel cloud-based, "no code" platform designed to enable researchers to create customized apps for efficient and standardised data collection tailored to the behavioural domain, facilitating capture of diverse data types, including video, images, and contextual metadata. We used the platform to develop an app supporting the creation of the Dog Pain Database, a novel comprehensive resource aimed at advancing research on behaviour-based pain indicators in dogs. Using the app, we created a large-scale, structured dataset of dogs with clinically diagnosed conditions expected to be associated with pain and discomfort, including demographic, medical, and pain-related information, alongside high-quality video recordings for future behavioural analyses. To evaluate the app's usability and its potential for future broader deployment, 14 veterinary professionals tested the app and provided structured feedback via a questionnaire. Results indicated strong usability and clarity, although agreement with using the app in daily clinic life was lower among external testers, pointing to possible barriers to routine integration. This proof-of-concept case study demonstrates the potential of cloud-based platforms like PetsDataLab to bridge research and practice by enabling scalable, standardised, and clinically compatible behavioural data collection. While developed for veterinary pain research, the approach is broadly applicable across behavioural science and supports open science principles through structured, reusable, and interoperable data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.