Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612148›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Nucleated red blood cells as a prognostic indicator in dogs with anemia.

F Hollmann, V Geisen, K Hartmann, R Doerfelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F HollmannLMU Small Animal Clinic, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
V GeisenLMU Small Animal Clinic, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
K HartmannLMU Small Animal Clinic, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.
R DoerfeltLMU Small Animal Clinic, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In human medicine, nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) in the peripheral blood have been associated with a poor prognosis and increased mortality in critically ill patients. In critically ill dogs, mortality was also significantly associated with high peripheral NRBC count. Objective: This study aimed to determine the presence of NRBCs in the peripheral blood of dogs with regenerative and non-regenerative anemia and to evaluate the prognostic relevance of NRBCs in anemic dogs. Furthermore, the correlation between NRBCs and other blood parameters was examined. Materials and methods: Medical records of 254 anemic dogs hospitalized from November 2013 to June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were a hematocrit of <30%, a minimum age of 6 months, and the presence of a manual blood smear evaluation. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc multiple comparison test, and Spearman correlation. Results: One hundred ninety-one of 254 patients had NRBCs in their blood smear. The absolute NRBC count was significantly higher in dogs with regenerative anemia [1,514/μl (92-40,810/μl)] compared to dogs with non-regenerative anemia [220/μl (10-5,260/μl); Conclusion: NRBCs commonly appear in the peripheral blood of dogs with regenerative anemia. Their presence and quantity are not associated with survival.

Indexed as

bone marrowcaninehematocritregenerationreticulocytesrubricytes

Identifiers

PMID40612148
PMCPMC12225541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.