ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Machine-learning prediction of 90-day readmission after primary total hip Arthroplasty: Analysis of 1,340 cases from the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry (MARCQI).
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning-based prediction models for readmission risk after total hip and knee arthroplasty.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- From patient notes to prognostication: The revolutionary potential of event-based foundation models in orthopaedics.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Construction and internal validation of a machine learning model for predicting 30-day readmission after hip surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ninety-day readmission after total hip arthroplasty (THA) drives cost and signals sub-optimal recovery, yet existing risk-stratification tools are imprecise. We aimed to develop and validate a machine-learning model to predict 90-day readmissions and to identify modifiable risk factors. Methods: The Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative (MARCQI) was queried for all primary THAs performed between 2012 and 2023 at a single institution. All surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons. Demographics, comorbidities, peri-operative variables, and discharge dispositions were extracted. Univariate analyses compared patients readmitted within 90 days with those not readmitted. A multilayer perceptron neural network (MPNN) was trained on 70% of the cohort and tested on the remaining 30%. Model discrimination was assessed with area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), and variable importance was calculated. Results: Of 1,340 THA patients, 69 (5.1%) were readmitted within 90 days, with rates climbing from 0% in ASA I to 24% in ASA IV (p < .001). Spearman correlations pinpointed length of stay (LOS) as the strongest readmission predictor (midnights ρ = 0.130; hours ρ = 0.123; both p < .001), followed by discharge to post-acute care (ρ = -0.074; p = .007), smoking (ρ = 0.084; p = .002), and alcohol use (ρ = -0.072; p = .008). No other demographic or comorbidity variables reached significance.An MPNN model achieved 94.7 % training accuracy, 95.2% testing accuracy, and an AUC of 0.71, ranking length of stay, ASA score, and bleeding disorders as its top three predictors. Conclusion: Prolonged hospital stays and higher ASA status are key drivers of 90-day readmission after THA. Integrating machine-learning risk stratification with strategies to shorten LOS, enhance preoperative optimization, and refine discharge planning may reduce readmission rates. Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.