ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025
Panel experts in shaping the nutrition and food safety guidelines for CYCWs in KwaZulu-Natal, SA.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nutritional knowledge, sustainable food practices and food safety, in child and youth care facilities in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The study is based on the view that food contamination and limited knowledge of health and hygiene are some challenges Child and Youth Care Centres (CYCCs) face. The South Africa Nutrition Education Programme (NEP) was a conceptual framework within which the study is embedded. Despite the existence of relevant legislation and processes on food preparation, safety and healthy eating, South Africa's CYCCs are still characterised by practice limitations. Aim: The study explores the use of expert panels in the review of newly developed guidelines for child and youth well-being. Setting: South African Experts in the field of CYCC and Academia. Methods: A qualitative approach was utilised to select three experts in Child and Youth Care, Child and Youth Care Education and Training and Food, Nutrition, and Community Research Education and Training. They were given 58 pages of guidelines to review and submit input. Thematic analysis was used to interpret the data. Results: The study's findings included six main themes and related sub-themes. The main themes include nutrition terminology and words, healthy eating plans, menu planning, food safety and hygiene, food preparation and the layout of the guidelines. In general, the study findings can be highlighted as inclusion of low-cost, widely available, cost-effective meals, utilising SA-acceptable terminology and focussing on SA sources rather than global literature. Conclusion: The guidelines are critical because CYCCs in South Africa currently lack such guidelines. Furthermore, the expert reviewers acknowledged that the guidelines were applicable and necessary in South African child and youth care facilities. Contribution: Child and Youth Care Centres in South Africa will be able to incorporate the guidelines into their everyday food handling and preparation procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.