Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612128›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Optometry preceptors' perceptions of clinical supervision at a South African university.

Zamadonda N Xulu-Kasaba, Firdous B Hoosen, Tina Mlanji, Naadira Moosa, Sthembile Ngcobo, Idani B Nelwamondo, Olivia B Baloyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zamadonda N Xulu-KasabaDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2729-8639
Firdous B HoosenDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4769-2001
Tina MlanjiDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4520-2226
Naadira MoosaDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6637-373X
Sthembile NgcoboDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7565-7747
Idani B NelwamondoDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3023-8554
Olivia B BaloyiDepartment of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7125-2681

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective clinical teaching in tertiary institutions relies heavily on clinical preceptors who supervise undergraduate students. While many health science disciplines have explored clinical supervisors' perceptions of their roles, limited evidence exists in optometry. Aim: This study aimed to explore optometry clinical supervisors' views on their effectiveness as clinical teachers. Setting: One-on-one interviews were conducted online via Zoom. Methods: Interviews were conducted in English and transcribed verbatim. Using a social constructivist paradigm and the inductive approach of content analysis, the data were analysed. Twelve of 22 eligible clinical supervisors (aged 21 years -50 years; 75% female) participated in the study. Results: Two main categories emerged: (1) Roles and responsibilities of optometry preceptors, and (2) Intervening conditions that facilitate or hinder effective supervision. Participants described the clinic as a nurturing learning environment, with supervisors modelling professional behaviour, prioritising learning, and fostering psychological safety. Supervisors supported students in developing higher-order thinking. Facilitating factors included collaboration with academic staff and institutional support. However, high workloads, lack of adequate remuneration, and human resource challenges were identified as barriers to effective supervision. Conclusion: Optometry clinical supervisors were committed to delivering effective preceptorship and creating a supportive clinical learning environment. Addressing workload, remuneration, and administrative challenges could enhance the supervision experience and sustain high-quality clinical teaching. Contribution: This study identifies key enablers and barriers to effective clinical supervision, offering insights to improve the clinical training experience for undergraduate optometry students.

Indexed as

clinical supervisionclinical teaching effectivenessclinical traininghealth professions educationoptometrypreceptorshipqualitative researchSouth Africaundergraduate clinical traininguniversity clinics

Identifiers

PMID40612128
PMCPMC12224065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.