ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Prevalence and Diagnostic Strategies for Sarcopenia in Menopausal and Non-Menopausal Women: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential association of psoas and paraspinal muscle volumes with appendicular lean mass index: AI-derived lumbar computed tomography three-dimensional volumetric indices in older Korean Women: an observational study.Asian spine journal · 2026Article
- Planetary health diet index and low muscle mass in adults aged 20-60 years: exploratory evaluation of a dairy-upweighted outcome-specific adaptation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Associations of Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity with Obesity and Low Muscle Mass Among Postmenopausal Chinese Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for sarcopenia in community hospital patients: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- The relationship between osteoporosis and sarcopenia parameters in postmenopausal women under 60 years of age: A cross-sectional study.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the prevalence of sarcopenia between postmenopausal and premenopausal women and evaluate the diagnostic performance of various screening methods combining anthropometric measurements and functional assessments. Methods: A total of 1630 women (794 postmenopausal, 836 premenopausal) were included. Data on upper arm circumference (AC), calf circumference (CC), and SARC-F questionnaire scores were collected. ROC curve analysis was performed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of individual and combined diagnostic models. Results: The overall prevalence of sarcopenia was 6.44%, with a higher prevalence in postmenopausal women (7.43%) than in premenopausal women (5.50%). Sarcopenic individuals had lower BMI and poorer functional performance. Among postmenopausal women, the SARC-F + CC combination demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 91.2), while in premenopausal women, the SARC-F + AC model was most effective (AUC = 85.53). The SARC-F + CC combination showed the best sensitivity (89.0%) and specificity (75.0%) across all participants. Conclusion: Sarcopenia is more prevalent in postmenopausal women, with menopause identified as a key risk factor. Combining SARC-F with calf circumference enhances diagnostic accuracy and is recommended for early screening in primary healthcare settings to facilitate timely interventions and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.