Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612049›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025

Ultraprocessed Food Consumption and Pre-Farmgate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Among United States Adults from 2007-2010.

Rhea Jayaswal, Sarah M Frank, Euridice Martinez Steele, Donald Rose, Lindsey Smith Taillie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rhea JayaswalCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Sarah M FrankCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Euridice Martinez SteeleCenter for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Donald RoseDepartment of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Lindsey Smith TaillieCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Changes to the food system can have consequences for human and planetary health, and one recent change is increased consumption of ultraprocessed foods (UPFs). Although correlations between UPF intake and human health have been evaluated in the United States, little is known about the association of UPF intake with pre-farmgate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), which account for the majority of GHGE across the food life cycle. Objectives: We used a nationally representative survey to evaluate the association between UPF consumption and pre-farmgate GHGE among United States adults. Methods: Data were from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2010. Participants were divided into quintiles based on proportion of grams from UPF using mean of 2-d dietary recall. The database of Food Recall Impacts on the Environment for Nutrition and Dietary Studies was used to estimate the pre-farmgate GHGE (in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents [kg CO Results: Consuming a greater proportion of grams from UPF was associated with higher pre-farmgate GHGE in unadjusted analyses. However, when the analyses were adjusted for total energy, we saw the opposite trend, such that consuming a higher proportion of grams from UPF was associated with lower pre-farmgate emissions: emissions for the highest quintile of UPF consumption were 4.47 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 4.27, 4.67) kg CO Conclusions: Although we find that diets with a greater proportion of grams from UPF have lower pre-farmgate GHGE, our analyses show an opposite trend when they are not adjusted for total energy intake, demonstrating the need for caution when analyzing the relationship of UPF intake with GHGE.

Indexed as

dataFRIENDSdietary emissionsenvironmental healthfood processinggreenhouse gas emissionsNHANESplanetary healthultraprocessed foods

Identifiers

PMID40612049
PMCPMC12221625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.