ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Optimal flexion angle for graft fixation in lateral extra-articular tenodesis combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lateral extra-articular procedures in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduce graft failure rates in elite and competitive athletes: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Preoperative dynamic anterior tibial translation is not predictive of graft rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Motor competence explains the variance in biomechanical variables related to anterior cruciate ligament injury risk, with distinct predictors for male and female athletes.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Optimal flexion angle for graft fixation in lateral extra-articular tenodesis combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This systematic review aims to investigate the knee flexion angles used for graft fixation in lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and their impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to February 2024. The inclusion criteria were original clinical studies (levels I-IV evidence) with at least 12 months of follow-up, reporting knee flexion angles during LET graft fixation in ACLR. Exclusion criteria included non-English articles, reviews, biomechanical studies, and case reports. Data on study design, patient numbers, fixation angles, and clinical outcomes were extracted, and study quality was assessed using the RoB 2 tool. Results: Out of 1134 studies identified, 21 met the inclusion criteria. The reported flexion angles for LET graft fixation ranged from full extension to 90°. Ten studies fixed the graft at 30°, consistently showing improved knee stability, reduced pivot-shift rates, and better functional outcomes, especially in high-risk patients. Three studies focused on graft fixation at 45° of flexion. Another four studies investigated fixation at 60° of knee flexion. Lastly, two studies assessed outcomes with fixation at 90°. Conclusion: LET combined with ACLR effectively restores knee stability across various flexion angles. While fixation at 30° is most commonly associated with positive outcomes, the lack of consensus on an optimal angle reflects differences in surgical techniques and patient-specific factors. Further prospective research with long-term follow-up is needed to validate these findings and guide clinical practice toward optimal knee flexion angles for graft fixation in LET procedures. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.