ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Understanding suicidality in adolescents and young adults at clinical high risk for psychosis: a narrative review on risk factors and clinical insights.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social connectedness and disconnectedness in individuals with recent onset psychosis and suicidal experiences: a systematic review of the evidence.BMC psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Suicide and Self-Harm Risk in Young People at Clinical High Risk of Psychosis: Exploring Comorbid Risk Factors and Potential Points for Intervention.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Complex Interplay: Sudden Emergence of First-Rank Schneiderian Symptoms Following TMS in a Patient With Severe Depression and Complex Trauma.Case reports in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prodromal stage of psychosis, referred to as the Clinical High Risk (CHR) phase, represents a critical period of heightened vulnerability to suicidality. Although suicidality is highly prevalent in CHR for psychosis (CHR-P) populations, research on this topic remains limited, often focusing more on the prevalence rates rather than the clinical implications. In this review, covering the past decade, we examined the prevalence and clinical significance of suicidality in adolescents and young adults at CHR-P. Our findings suggest that suicidality in CHR individuals arises from a complex interplay of depressive symptoms and both negative and positive symptomatology. Additionally, psychosocial stressors such as perceived stigma and discrimination further exacerbate suicide risk. Key risk factors include prior suicide attempts, impaired social functioning, psychiatric comorbidities, and stigma-related distress. Furthermore, anhedonia and suspiciousness emerged as independent predictors of suicidality. Suicidality rates vary by context, with higher prevalence in community-recruited CHR samples than in help-seeking individuals. This review highlights the need for a multidimensional suicide prevention approach, integrating early identification, comprehensive assessment, and targeted interventions. Future research should refine diagnostic tools, clarify the clinical trajectory from CHR to psychosis, and develop tailored intervention strategies to mitigate suicide risk in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.