ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Attitudes toward lithium prescription among psychiatrists in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge Gaps and Systemic Challenges in Antidepressant Prescribing: Insights from Jordanian Psychiatry Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mental illness with an estimated overall lifetime prevalence of 2.4% worldwide. Various pharmacological agents are available for treating BD, one of which is lithium. Lithium is commonly recommended as a first-line treatment during the maintenance phase of BD. However, prescribing patterns for mood disorders vary among countries, with notable regional differences in lithium use. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 287 psychiatrists and psychiatry trainees in Saudi Arabia. A survey consisting of 22 multiple-choice questions was sent via WhatsApp to all participants. Data were collected between January and May, 2024. Results: Lithium was prescribed to BD patients by 72.5% of the participants. Most participants (70.7%) prescribed lithium to up to 25% of their patients. The primary reasons for not prescribing lithium were concerns about its adverse effects (64.8%), followed by the need for monitoring (53.7%), and the unavailability/shortage of lithium supply in Saudi Arabia (45.6%). Psychiatrists working in general hospitals (p=0.017) were more likely to prescribe lithium to patients with BD. In contrast, psychiatrists with limited experience or those who were unfamiliar with lithium treatment (p=0.001) were less likely to prescribe lithium. Conclusion: The use of lithium in Saudi Arabia is often influenced by concerns about its side effects, the need for monitoring, and product availability. Psychiatrists' familiarity with lithium and the settings in which they practice are significant factors shaping prescribing behavior. Future efforts should focus on addressing the barriers to lithium prescription, including enhancing clinician training and improving access to lithium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.