ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2025
Lack of Sex Differences in Psychostimulant-Induced Locomotor Activity When Comparing Rats From the Same Behavioral Groups.
Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences between males and females in psychostimulant/sucrose self-administration (when observed) may not necessarily be driven by biological sex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The recreational-to-habitual shift in psychostimulant use is an economic demand parameter that is unrelated to drug consumption levels (under normal and punishment conditions).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- A Challenge To The Assumption That Short- versus Long-Access Groups of Opioid Users Represent Distinct Phenotypes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We hypothesized that sex differences in baseline-, saline-, and psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity (LMA) would not be observed when we compared males and females that belonged to the same behavioral group(s). Our aim was to determine whether we could detect differences between males and females within a truly distinct behavioral group. To identify behavioral groups, current models use median-split analysis typically of one variable, but this procedure may not be effective. With the rationale that clustering analysis of several variables is a more robust grouping strategy, we developed a new model termed the MISSING (Mapping Intrinsic Sex Similarities as an Integral quality of Normalized Groups) model to test our hypothesis. Methods: We obtained baseline LMA, drug-induced LMA, and a new variable that integrates both baseline and drug-induced LMA (drug-induced LMA normalized-to-baseline activity-time) from LMA assessments following saline (males Results: The MISSING model was superior to the median split in distinct behavioral group identification. For both models, we confirmed that there were no differences in psychostimulant-induced LMA when we compared males and females within the same group/cluster. Conclusions: There were no sex differences in psychostimulant-induced LMA when we compared rats from the same behavioral group(s).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.