Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612023›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry global open science2025

Lack of Sex Differences in Psychostimulant-Induced Locomotor Activity When Comparing Rats From the Same Behavioral Groups.

Anthony M Tigano, Martin O Job

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry global open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony M TiganoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
Martin O JobDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We hypothesized that sex differences in baseline-, saline-, and psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity (LMA) would not be observed when we compared males and females that belonged to the same behavioral group(s). Our aim was to determine whether we could detect differences between males and females within a truly distinct behavioral group. To identify behavioral groups, current models use median-split analysis typically of one variable, but this procedure may not be effective. With the rationale that clustering analysis of several variables is a more robust grouping strategy, we developed a new model termed the MISSING (Mapping Intrinsic Sex Similarities as an Integral quality of Normalized Groups) model to test our hypothesis. Methods: We obtained baseline LMA, drug-induced LMA, and a new variable that integrates both baseline and drug-induced LMA (drug-induced LMA normalized-to-baseline activity-time) from LMA assessments following saline (males Results: The MISSING model was superior to the median split in distinct behavioral group identification. For both models, we confirmed that there were no differences in psychostimulant-induced LMA when we compared males and females within the same group/cluster. Conclusions: There were no sex differences in psychostimulant-induced LMA when we compared rats from the same behavioral group(s).

Indexed as

CocaineLocomotor activityMedian-split analysisNormal mixtures clusteringPsychostimulantSex differences

Identifiers

PMID40612023
PMCPMC12221628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.