Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612015›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025

Integrative analysis of high-dimensional quantile regression with contrasted penalization.

Panpan Ren, Xu Liu, Xiao Zhang, Peng Zhan, Tingting Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Panpan RenSchool of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xu LiuSchool of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiao ZhangSchool of Data Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Peng ZhanSchool of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Tingting QiuSchool of Statistics and Mathematics, Shanghai Lixin University of Accounting and Finance, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of big data, the simultaneous analysis of multiple high-dimensional, heavy-tailed datasets has become essential. Integrative analysis offers a powerful approach to combine and synthesize information from these various datasets, and often outperforming traditional meta-analysis and single-dataset analysis. In this paper, we introduce a novel high-dimensional integrative quantile regression that can accommodate the complexities inherent in multi-dataset analysis. A contrast penalty that smooths regression coefficients is introduced to account for across-dataset structures and improve variable selection. To ease the computational burden associated with high-dimensional quantile regression, a new algorithm is developed that is effective at computing solution paths and selecting significant variables. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate its competitive performance. Additionally, the proposed method is applied to data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, illustrating its practical utility in identifying influential factors affecting support income for the elderly. Findings indicate that adult children's individual characteristics and emotional comfort are primary factors of support income, and the extent of their impact varies across regions.

Indexed as

62G0862H1262P25contrast penaltyForward and backward stagewisehigh-dimensional quantile regressionspatial heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID40612015
PMCPMC12217111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.