Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40612010›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025

A scoping review of authorisation pathway for COVID

Supapitch Suphap, Parnnaphat Luksameesate, Osot Nerapusee, Puree Anantachoti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Supapitch SuphapMedicines Regulation Division, Thailand Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5819-0751
Parnnaphat LuksameesateFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1295-7726
Osot NerapuseeSchool of Pharmacy, Eastern Asia University, Pathumthani, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8919-0063
Puree AnantachotiFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-0203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In response to COVID-19 pandemic, NRAs implemented expedited mechanisms such as EUAs and CMAs, relying on international bodies, to authorize vaccines. Documenting these authorization pathways across countries informs NRAs and strengthens future pandemic responses. Existing studies on COVID-19 vaccine approvals are limited, underscoring the need for a comprehensive review. This study aimed to explore approval pathways, investigate supporting strategies, and review times for COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: A scoping review was conducted, covering countries with stringent regulatory authorities or countries with significant COVID-19 vaccine manufacturing or rapid rollout. Searches using terms such as 'approval process' and 'COVID-19 vaccine' were performed in electronic databases and on official regulatory authority websites. Countries without authorization information or with language barriers were excluded. Data on vaccine authorization processes including supporting strategies, submission criteria, and approval timelines were extracted and analyzed using content and comparative regulatory analysis. Results: Twenty-four regulatory pathways from 20 countries were identified, categorized as 'emergency use authorization' (EUA) ( Conclusion: Despite different regulatory pathways, all countries approved the first COVID-19 vaccine quickly. International collaboration was crucial in accelerating approval times. The COVID-19 pandemic positively stimulated global preparedness for serious pandemics.

Indexed as

approval processauthorisation pathwayCOVID-19 vaccinespandemicregulation

Identifiers

PMID40612010
PMCPMC12224729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.