ArticleAfrican journal of disability2025
Optometrists' perceptions of vision impairment services in public hospitals of Limpopo province.
Article in African journal of disability, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vision impairment (VI) services aim to mitigate the effect of VI and provide opportunities for visually impaired individuals to actively participate in their daily activities. Objectives: To determine optometrists' perceptions regarding VI services in public hospitals within Limpopo province, South Africa. Method: A descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional study was conducted between January and August 2023 across 37 public hospitals, using a structured questionnaire. Data obtained from the participants' responses were analysed to describe the level of VI services. Results: The study sample included 65 optometrists with 71% female, yielding a response rate of 83%. Over 90% of the participants were aware of the World Health Organization definition of VI. The majority of participants (54%) reported referring patients with VI to a hospital multidisciplinary team, while less than 50% provided optimal spectacle correction. The main barriers to providing VI services were: the lack of assistive devices (97%), and equipment (95%), poor access (80%), insufficient space (66%), and the lack of training (66%). The primary barriers to the uptake of VI services were the lack of awareness (86%) and the cost of VI services (80%). Conclusion: The provision of VI services in Limpopo province is currently limited. The factors contributing to the limited VI services are avoidable; therefore, efforts to enhance the availability of equipment, access and provision of comprehensive VI services are crucial to improving the quality of life for affected individuals utilising public hospitals in Limpopo province. Contribution: The study describes the optometrists' perceptions of VI services in public hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.