Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611939›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Interactive effects between soil properties and bacterial communities in tomato rhizosphere under the application of microbial agents.

Longxue Wei, Dongbo Zhao, Lianghai Guo, Jianjun Guo, Jinying Zhu, Yanting Pei, Peiyan Guan, Zhihui Guo, Huini Cui, Jiansheng Gao and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Longxue WeiDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Dongbo ZhaoDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0002-2754-8140
Lianghai GuoDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Jianjun GuoDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Jinying ZhuDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Yanting PeiDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Peiyan GuanDezhou College, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Zhihui GuoDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Huini CuiDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Jiansheng GaoDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Yongjun LiDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Liang ZhangDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Fuyan WangDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.
Peng LiuDezhou Institute of Agricultural Science, Dezhou, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of microbial agents on physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and bacterial communities in tomato ( Methods: Tomato rhizosphere soils treated with various microbial agents, as well as an untreated control (FQ_CK), were analyzed. The effects of different microbial agents on the physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and bacterial community structure of tomato rhizosphere soil after 2 years of continuous cropping were analyzed using 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing technique. Results: With the application of microbial agents, microbial agent treatment (

Indexed as

BacteriaRhizosphereSoilSoil MicrobiologySolanum lycopersicumHypocrealesMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilBacteriaContinuous croppingMicrobial agentsSoil propertiesTomato

Identifiers

PMID40611939
PMCPMC12225625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.