ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Fluoro-forest: A random forest workflow for cell type annotation in high-dimensional immunofluorescence imaging.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cyclic immunofluorescence (IF) techniques enable deep phenotyping of cells and help quantify tissue organization at high resolution. Due to its high dimensionality, workflows typically rely on unsupervised clustering, followed by cell type annotation at a cluster level for cell type assignment. Most of these methods use marker expression averages that lack a statistical evaluation of cell type annotations, which can result in misclassification. Here, we propose a strategy through an end-to-end pipeline using a semi-supervised, random forests approach to predict cell type annotations. Our method includes cluster-based sampling for training data, cell type prediction, and downstream visualization for interpretability of cell annotation that ultimately improves classification results. We show that our workflow can annotate cells more accurately with a training set <5% of the total number of cells tested. In addition, our pipeline outputs cell type annotation probabilities and model performance metrics for users to decide if it could boost their existing clustering-based workflow results for complex IF data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.