ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Almost Free Enhancement of Multi-Population PRS: From Data-Fission to Pseudo-GWAS Subsampling.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many multi-population polygenic risk score (PRS) methods have been proposed to improve prediction accuracy in underrepresented populations; however, no single method outperforms other methods across all data scenarios. Although integrating PRS results across multiple methods and populations may lead to more accurate predictions, this approach may be limited by the availability of individual-level tuning data to calculate combination weights. In this manuscript, we introduce MIXPRS, a robust PRS integration framework based on data fission principles, to effectively combine multiple multi-population PRS methods using only genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from multiple populations. Specifically, MIXPRS employs SNP pruning to mitigate linkage disequilibrium (LD) mismatch between the training GWAS summary statistics and LD reference panels, and utilizes non-negative least squares regression to robustly estimate PRS combination weights. Extensive simulations and real-data analyses involving 22 continuous traits and four binary traits across five populations from the UK Biobank and All of Us datasets demonstrate that MIXPRS consistently outperforms the existing methods in prediction accuracy. Because MIXPRS relies solely on GWAS summary statistics, it enjoys broad accessibility, robustness, and generalizability for underrepresented populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.