ArticleSage open aging
Characteristics of Wearable Activity Tracker Users and Their Association with Health-Management Satisfaction Among Older Japanese Adults.
Article in Sage open aging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although wearable activity trackers (WAT) are considered beneficial for health-management in older adults, their prevalence and impact on health satisfaction are unclear. We limited our study to older Japanese adults who used smartphones, tablets, or personal computers. We categorized the participants into WAT users and non-users. The survey examined the use of WAT which was a wristwatch, other type (glasses, ring, and clip); demographics; health-related measures; Information and Communication Technology (ICT) accessibility; and health-management satisfaction. From 12,869 older Japanese adults, 8,876 adults responded to the survey, and we included 3,467 adults who used digital devices. The prevalence of WAT use was 4.4% (men: 61.4%). The reason for using WAT was health-management in 61.4% of cases, mainly for monitoring blood pressure/heart rate control (64.3%) and exercise (60.6%). Gender-stratified logistic regression analysis showed that men with higher ICT accessibility, exercise habits, and cardiometabolic diseases were more likely to use WAT. The study found no factors of the WAT use in women and no significant difference in health-management satisfaction between WAT users and non-users. The results suggest that simply wearing a WAT does not increase satisfaction with health-management. The study recommends greater opportunities to teach the effective and active use of WAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.