ReviewSage open aging
Volunteer Programs for Hospitalized Older Adults in North America, Europe, and Australia: A Scoping Review.
Review in Sage open aging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the rapidly aging population, hospitals are increasingly caring for more older patient. Implementing volunteer programs focused on providing care to hospitalized older adults is a way for hospitals to better support them. Despite the growing presence of volunteer programs in hospital settings, there remains a limited understanding of how these programs are structured, their impact on patient care, and their integration within healthcare teams. Addressing this gap is essential for optimizing volunteer engagement and improving hospital-based support for older adults. The purpose of this scoping review is to assess the existing literature surrounding volunteer programs designed to support hospitalized older adults and identify gaps that are present for future research and inquiry. Employing Arskey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology, 27 publications met our study's inclusion criteria. Thematically analyzing our data surfaced three overall themes: (1) the Influence of Volunteer Training on Roles and Functions, (2) Volunteer Perspectives on their Roles, and (3) the Impact of Volunteers in Hospital Settings. We noted that volunteers have different motivations for participating in volunteer programs. Healthcare professionals generally have positive views of hospital volunteer programs for older adults, but also express reservations and tend to have limited interactions with volunteers. Moreover, as volunteer roles were seen mainly to supplement family caregiver roles, future volunteer programs are encouraged to also consider the unique roles and needs of families and develop solutions to ensure that quality care can be delivered to both older patients and their family caregivers. Future research should explore how volunteer programs can be better integrated within interdisciplinary teams, assess their long-term impact on patient outcomes, and identify strategies to strengthen collaboration between volunteers, healthcare professionals, and family caregivers to optimize care for hospitalized older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.