ArticleEndoscopy international open2025
Positive provocative testing and symptom evaluation for detecting upper extremity repetitive use injuries among endoscopists.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Endoscopists have reported experiencing musculoskeletal pain, yet a comprehensive and objective investigation into repetitive use symptoms or injuries has not been conducted. We aimed to evaluate a cohort of endoscopists for upper extremity repetitive use injury. Methods: We employed a 43 author-developed questionnaire as well as the validated QuickDASH (Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand) questionnaire. Subjects were evaluated by occupational therapists to identify clinical evidence of injury. Demographic factors, reported symptoms, and signs of injury were then analyzed. Results: Overall, 34.3% reported experiencing pain while 17.1% reported numbness. In the prior week, 48.5% of participants had been bothered by pain, 11.4% felt tingling, 17.1% experienced interrupted sleep, and 17.1% reported limitations in work duties. Physical testing revealed that many endoscopists had below-normal strength in their right grip (48.6%) and left grip (42.9%), and 88.6% had below-normal pinch strengths for their age and gender. In addition, 71.4% of the group had at least one abnormal positive provocative test. Participants who reported numbness at night ( Conclusions: Our study found a high prevalence of repetitive use injury symptoms among endoscopists, corroborated by objective physical examination and testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.