Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611843›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Ex vivo evaluation of a novel through-the-scope traction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Ludovico Alfarone, Roberto De Sire, Boris Rosenbaum, Ali Aidibi, Christophe Cellier, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici, Gabriel Rahmi, Roberta Maselli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ludovico AlfaroneEndoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Department of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Italy.
Roberto De SireEndoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Department of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6448-2649
Boris RosenbaumGastroenterology and Endoscopy, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Ali AidibiGastroenterology and Endoscopy, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Christophe CellierGastroenterology and Endoscopy, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Cesare HassanDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7167-1459
Alessandro RepiciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Gabriel RahmiGastroenterology and Endoscopy, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Roberta MaselliEndoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Department of Gastroenterology, Rozzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique used for resection of large neoplastic lesions, providing great oncological outcomes. However, ESD is technically challenging with a long learning curve, high complication rates, and extended procedure times. To address these limitations, various traction-assisted methods have been developed. This study evaluated a novel through-the-scope traction device (TRACMOTION, Fujifilm, Japan), which offers consistent and adjustable traction, in a pilot multicenter randomized ex vivo trial. Patients and methods: The study included six endoscopists with limited ESD experience performing ESD on ex vivo porcine stomach models. Participants were randomized into two groups: those using TRACMOTION-assisted ESD (TM-ESD) and those performing conventional ESD (C-ESD). Each trainee completed six procedures, split equally between both groups. The primary outcome was resection speed, whereas secondary outcomes included en bloc, R0 resection rates, perforation rates, and rates of speedy procedures (>20 mm²/min). Results: The TM-ESD group achieved a higher median resection speed of 20.75 mm²/min (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.56-29.25) in comparison to 15.10 mm²/min (95% CI 12.8-16.6) in the C-ESD group ( Conclusions: TRACMOTION significantly improves the efficiency of ESD, reducing procedure time and complication rates. This traction device could potentially facilitate broader adoption of ESD in clinical practice. However, further research in human trials is necessary to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Endoscopic resection (ESD, EMRc, ...)Endoscopy Upper GI TractPerformance and complicationsQuality and logistical aspectsTraining

Identifiers

PMID40611843
PMCPMC12223946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.