ReviewEndoscopy international open2025
Gastroesophageal reflux disease over time in endoscopic versus surgical myotomy for treatment of achalasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Achalasia, a motor disorder of the esophagus, is treated with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) or Heller myotomy with fundoplication (HMF). Although POEM lacks an antireflux mechanism, potentially increasing postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), limiting the endoscopic approach, this difference in GERD tends to diminish over time. The objective of this study was to compare GERD over time, the need for regular gastric acid suppression therapy (GAST), effectiveness, and safety between POEM and HMF in treating achalasia. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching mainly in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Primary outcomes included early (< 12 months) and late (≥ 12 months) evaluations of postoperative GERD based on endoscopic criteria of the Lyon Consensus 2.0, and GAST. Secondary outcomes included clinical success (Eckardt score ≤ 3), procedure time, length of stay, and major adverse events (AEs) (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ 2). Results: Thirty-two observational studies and two randomized trials were included, totaling 14,125 patients. GERD was higher in POEM in early evaluation (risk ratio [RR] = 3.03; Conclusions: A higher rate of early GERD is observed in POEM compared with HMF, with the difference waning over time and reaching equivalence after 12 months, despite a higher rate of GAST in the endoscopic group. POEM also exhibited effectiveness and safety comparable to the surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.