ArticleEndoscopy international open2025
Radiofrequency ablation: Solution for a long-time therapeutic dilemma of chronic radiation proctitis?
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Treatment for Chronic Hemorrhagic Radiation Enteropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Advances in therapy · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Chronic radiation proctitis is a prevalent condition following pelvic radiation therapy, occasionally leading to significant blood loss. Although medical treatment and argon plasma coagulation (APC) are well-established options, endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an emerging treatment that has shown promising results in smaller studies. However, further research, particularly on long-term outcomes, is necessary. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcome of endoscopic RFA in patients with chronic radiation proctitis, with a particular focus on long-term outcome. Patients and methods: This retrospective study included all patients treated with RFA for radiation-induced chronic proctitis suffering from hematochezia at the Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, between 2018 and 2023. Results: Thirteen patients were included in the study, with RFA being the initial treatment in five cases. RFA sessions were performed once in nine patients, twice in three patients, and three times in one patient. After a median follow-up period of 58 months, 69.2% (n= 9) remained still symptom-free and 30.8% (n= 4) reported only mild rectal bleeding after hard stools. Conclusions: These data indicate that RFA is a highly effective and safe treatment option for chronic radiation proctitis, providing excellent long-term results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.