ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
Design and implementation of mHealth applications for older people with cancer: A scoping review.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use and Influencing Factors of mHealth Services Among Adult Survivors of Cancer: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Preparedness for generative AI adoption among Chinese cancer survivors: a multi-center cross-sectional survey study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This scoping review aimed to systematically synthesize the evidence on the functions, design, implementation strategies, and evaluation approaches of mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) developed for older adults with cancer, to inform future research and practice. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, with an updated systematic search of five databases (Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) from January 1, 2008, to February 28, 2025. The review adhered to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews. Results: Thirty studies involving 19 mHealth apps were included. Primary functions encompassed health monitoring, education, symptom reminders, consultation, and personalized interventions. While most apps incorporated user-centered designs, the integration of theoretical frameworks and age-specific evaluation tools was limited. Implementation strategies varied, emphasizing user training, technical support, and family engagement. Social support features were underrepresented. Studies were predominantly conducted in Western countries, highlighting the need for culturally adapted interventions in East Asia. Conclusions: This scoping review revealed that while mHealth apps for older adults with cancer have advanced in user-centered design and preliminary evaluations, critical gaps remain in theory-driven development, standardized usability assessment, and cultural adaptation. Future work should prioritize co-design, theoretical frameworks, and culturally sensitive strategies to enhance app usability and clinical integration. Systematic review registration: The review protocol has been registered in the OSF registry (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/67J9N).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.