ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Prediction of a CLDN18.2 Targeted Antibody Drug Conjugate Pharmacokinetics in Cancer Patients Using PBPK Modeling and Simulation.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a promising anticancer approach. Although physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling became essential in Pharmacometrics to characterize exposure in different tissues, very few PBPK models have been published for ADCs, none within the PK-Sim/MoBi software. To capture the pharmacokinetics (PK) of an anti-Claudin 18.2 ADC, a PBPK model was built in PK-Sim and MoBi and compared to observations from three clinical studies after intravenous (IV) administration in 109 patients with cancer. The PK parameters were considered inaccurate if the predicted error ratios were outside the two-fold error range (0.5-2). In PK-Sim, we defined one PBPK model comprising three compounds (ADC, payload, and naked antibody), which were mechanistically linked. This model captured the ADC PK profile. However, additional clearance mechanisms were essential to improve the fit of the ADC elimination phase. After integration of target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) and deconjugation of the payload in MoBi, 3 parameters were optimized for each of the ADC and the payload (degradation rate constant and reference concentration of the target, deconjugation rate constant, lipophilicity, nonspecific hepatic clearance rate constant and passive renal clearance of the payload). The PK data were adequately captured for both observed compounds, with a predicted error ratio within the two-fold range: C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.