ArticleUrology research & practice2025
Unraveling Online Perspectives and Misinformation Surrounding Urinary Tract Infections: A Thematic Analysis of 1200 Instagram Posts.
Article in Urology research & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2025
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Urinary tract infections are burdensome for patients. Social media is increasingly used as a platform for patients and public to seek and share support. The study aimed to evaluate what patients encounter when they turn to Instagram for urinary tract infection-related support and advice. Methods: The first 200 posts appearing on the "top posts" section of Instagram for 6 key hashtags (#UTI, #UTIs, #urinarytractinfection, #urinarytractinfections, #bladderin- fection, #bladderinfections) were selected. Thematic analysis (TA) was used to identify themes present in the Instagram captions. Results: Across 1200 posts analyzed, 5 main themes were identified. 1) "We can help…," this was largely commercial advertising with the promotion of healthcare clinics. 2) "I'm suffering," which contained first-person narratives about an unpleasant experience with a disease or treatment as well as frustration at health services. 3)!"Warning signs," posts describing signs or symptoms that the creator claims indicate poor health. 4)!"Remedies," these posts detailed therapies to try, often herbal. 5) "Avoid and change," which covered triggers to avoid symptom flare ups. Conclusion: There is a large amount of content on social media related to UTIs. Urologists should be aware that patients may have sought out advice using these platforms and may therefore have received misinformation and products that have been advertised but lack scientific evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.