ArticleJMIR AI2025
Identifying Asthma-Related Symptoms From Electronic Health Records Using a Hybrid Natural Language Processing Approach Within a Large Integrated Health Care System: Retrospective Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving machine-learning development in allergology: bridging the gap between open-access and cohort-based databases.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Review
- Multimodal EHR-Based Prediction of Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Symptoms of Asthma Extracted Through Natural Language Processing and Their Associations With Acute Asthma Exacerbation in Adults With Mild Asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Asthma-related symptoms are significant predictors of asthma exacerbation. Most of these symptoms are documented in clinical notes in a free-text format, and effective methods for capturing asthma-related symptoms from unstructured data are lacking. Objective: The study aims to develop a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm for identifying symptoms associated with asthma from clinical notes within a large integrated health care system. Methods: We analyzed unstructured clinical notes within 2 years before a visit with asthma diagnosis in 2013-2018 and 2021-2022 to identify 4 common asthma-related symptoms. Related terms and phrases were initially compiled from publicly available resources and then refined through clinician input and chart review. A rule-based NLP algorithm was iteratively developed and refined via multiple rounds of chart review followed by adjudication. Subsequently, transformer-based deep learning algorithms were trained using the same manually annotated datasets. A hybrid NLP algorithm was then generated by combining rule-based and transformer-based algorithms. The hybrid NLP algorithm was finally applied to the implementation notes. Results: A total of 11,374,552 eligible clinical notes with 128,211,793 sentences were analyzed. After applying the hybrid algorithm to implementation notes, at least 1 asthma-related symptom was identified in 1,663,450 out of 127,763,086 (1.3%) sentences and 858,350 out of 11,364,952 (7.55%) notes, respectively. Cough was the most frequently identified at both the sentence (1,363,713/127,763,086, 1.07%) and note (660,685/11,364,952, 5.81%) levels, while chest tightness was the least frequent at both the sentence (141,733/127,763,086, 0.11%) and note (64,251/11,364,952, 0.57%) levels. The frequency of multiple symptoms ranged from 0.03% (36,057/127,763,086) to 0.38% (484,050/127,763,086) at the sentence level and 0.10% (10,954/11,364,952) to 1.85% (209,805/11,364,952) at the note level. Validation against 1600 manually annotated clinical notes yielded a positive predictive value ranging from 96.53% (wheezing) to 97.42% (chest tightness) at the sentence level and 96.76% (wheezing) to 97.42% (chest tightness) at the note level. Sensitivity ranged from 93.9% (dyspnea) to 95.95% (cough) at the sentence level and 96% (chest tightness) to 99.07% (cough) at the note level. All 4 symptoms had F1-scores greater than 0.95 at both the sentence and note levels, regardless of NLP algorithms. Conclusions: The developed NLP algorithms could effectively capture asthma-related symptoms from unstructured clinical notes. These algorithms could be used to facilitate early asthma detection and predict exacerbation risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.