Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611458›Full record

ReviewNursing in critical care2025

The Modern Role of Neonatal PICCs Subspecialty.

Matheus Van Rens, Matthew Ostroff, Mohammad A A Bayoumi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Modern Role of Neonatal PICCs Subspecialty.Nursing in critical care · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matheus Van RensNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Radboud University Medical Center, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Matthew OstroffSt. Joseph's Regional Medical Center, Paterson, New Jersey, USA.
Mohammad A A BayoumiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Women's Wellness and Research Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2627-4806

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This perspective review examines the evolving role of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters (n-PICCs) as a distinct subspecialty within neonatal vascular access. n-PICCs are indispensable for delivering long-term intravenous therapies in critically ill neonates. The review explores ethical considerations, equitable access to vascular access technologies and prioritisation of patient safety in procedural training. The implementation of specialised vascular access teams, rather than an all-staff model, is advocated to enhance procedural success, reduce device-related complications and promote a culture of accountability. Future directions include the development of smart catheter technologies, pseudo-tunnelling techniques and simulation-based education to advance and maintain clinical competency.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralClinical CompetenceCritical IllnessHumansInfant, NewbornPatient Safetycatheter safetymodified Seldinger techniqueneonatal intensive careneonatal PICCsimulationVAMP frameworkvascular access

Identifiers

PMID40611458
PMCPMC12231926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.