Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611436›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2025

An International Validation of the Stigma Impact Scale With People With Dementia.

Jem Bhatt, Sara Evans-Lacko, Katrina Scior, Rob Saunders

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jem BhattUCL Unit for Stigma Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7273-7234
Sara Evans-LackoCare Policy and Evaluation, Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4691-2630
Katrina SciorUCL Unit for Stigma Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4679-0090
Rob SaundersResearch Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, CORE Data Lab, Centre of Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7077-8729

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease InternationalEconomic and Social Research Council ES/P010938/1Medical Research Council MR/R023697/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA robust psychometric instrument is imperative to measure the devastating impact of self-stigma in dementia to adequately inform policy and practice. Our objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Stigma Impact Scale in a global sample of people with dementia.

methodData were analysed from the World Alzheimer Report including 710 participants in 42 countries who completed the SIS. Detailed psychometric analyses of the SIS included estimating reliability, convergent validity with the Warwick-Edinburgh mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) and the Dementia Quality of Life instrument (DQoL), the factor structure of the measure (through both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis).

resultsThe SIS and its subscales had 'good' to 'excellent' internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.883-0.943). However, convergent validity correlations were not in the predicted direction; no significant correlations were noted between the SIS and the WEMWBS and DQoL. Factor analysis suggested marginal improvements in global fit indices for the observed model compared to the theoretical model, though none met the thresholds for acceptable fit. The final proposed model had three factors: rejection and secrecy, loneliness and belonging and perceived social isolation. Most SIS items were strongly endorsed by participants.

conclusionThe SIS is the most robustly tested instrument measuring self-stigma in dementia. The SIS has good to excellent reliability and relevance to the target population, however future work is required to improve the factor structure of the scale. Further the results of the validity testing pose a number of theoretical and empirical questions for future research.

Indexed as

DementiaSocial StigmaAgedAged, 80 and overFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesdementiadiscriminationpsychometricsstigma

Identifiers

PMID40611436
PMCPMC12231944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.