ArticleCurrent Alzheimer research2025
Alterations of
Article in Current Alzheimer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Association and Mechanistic Insights Linking Bisphenol A to Psoriasis: Integrative Analysis of Bulk Transcriptomics, Network Toxicology, Mendelian Randomization and Single‑cell RNA Sequencing.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Genomic and proteomic conversion of brain ischemia to Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Alterations of Apolipoprotein A1, E, and J Genes in the Frontal Cortex in an Ischemic Model of Alzheimer's Disease with 2-Year Survival.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Direct and indirect role of non-coding RNAs in company with amyloid and tau protein in promoting neuroinflammation in post-ischemic brain neurodegeneration.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCurrently, there is no information on changes in the
aimsThe goal of the investigation was to evaluate alterations in the behavior of MATERIALS AND
methodsGene expression was assessed using an RT-PCR protocol at 2-30 days and 6-24-months after ischemia.
resultsBECN1 gene expression after ischemic injury was lower than the control group during 7-30- days and 18 months, whereas overexpression was noted after 2 days, 6-, 12- and 24 months. In the case of BNIP3 gene expression, it was lower than the control group for 2-7 days and higher than the control throughout the remaining time after ischemia. Increased expression of the CASP3 gene was observed except on days 7-30 following ischemia when its expression was lower compared to control values. DISCUSSION: The data seem to indicate that the observed changes in gene expression may reflect the activation and inhibition of different mechanisms involved in the advancement of neurodegeneration after ischemia.
conclusionOverexpression of BECN1gene is likely to be associated with the induction of neuroprotective phenomena, whereas overexpression of BNIP3 and CASP3 genes can cause harmful effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40611423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.