Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611381›Full record

SynthesisClinical and translational science2025

Quantifying Sample Representation in Global Pharmacogenomic Studies of Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review.

Linsey Jackson, Karina Delaney, Justin Bobo, Caroline W Grant, Leslie Hassett, Liewei Wang, Richard Weinshilboum, Paul E Croarkin, Ann Moyer, Melanie T Gentry and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Linsey JacksonDepartment of Clinical and Translational Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6613-7208
Karina DelaneyDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-5052-167X
Justin BoboDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-8656-3408
Caroline W GrantDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9342-2138
Leslie HassettLibraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1889-8387
Liewei WangDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-8531
Richard WeinshilboumDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4911-7985
Paul E CroarkinDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6843-6503
Ann MoyerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2590-7218
Melanie T GentryDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9484-3206
Arjun P AthreyaDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9764-1768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a substantial public health challenge. Pharmacogenomics (PGx), which identifies genetic variations that predict drug treatment outcomes, may have utility for clinical practice, but adequate representation of all populations is needed. As precision medicine in psychiatry moves towards the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to predict treatment outcomes using PGx data, representation of diverse populations will be especially important in order to mitigate algorithmic bias and achieve equitable and generalizable findings. This work sought to quantify population diversity in pharmacogenomic studies of MDD through a systematic review. Data from 390 MDD antidepressant PGx studies were extracted from 5739 articles screened. Studies summarized were predominantly conducted in Europe, East Asia, and North America. Across all global studies, the study population comprised 57.3% White, 36.4% Asian, 1.7% Black, 3.5% Hispanic/Latino, and 0.1% Native American or Indigenous participants. Only sixty-three (16.2%) studies included Black or Latino/Hispanic patients. Additionally, Black, Asian, Hispanic/Latino, and American Indian/Alaska Native populations were statistically underrepresented in U.S. study populations when compared to national census data, while Asian and Black populations were underrepresented in the United Kingdom. The overrepresentation of participants from a limited number of countries combined with the underrepresentation of Black and Hispanic/Latino populations could impact the extent to which pharmacogenomic testing and associated AI/ML-based PGx tools could individualize antidepressant medication regimens for treating MDD.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsMajor Depressive DisorderPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic TestingHumansMachine LearningPrecision MedicineTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agentsantidepressantsmajor depressive disorder (MDD)pharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID40611381
PMCPMC12226244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.