Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611307›Full record

ArticleInjury epidemiology2025

Public opinion on civil war in the USA as of mid-2024: findings from a nationally representative survey.

Garen J Wintemute, Yueju Li, Mona A Wright, Andrew Crawford, Elizabeth A Tomsich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Garen J WintemuteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. gjwintemute@ucdavis.edu.
Yueju LiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Mona A WrightDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Andrew CrawfordDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Elizabeth A TomsichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2023, Wave 2 of an annual, nationally representative longitudinal survey found a concerning level of agreement that civil war was likely in the USA and, among those who agreed, widespread belief that civil war was needed. This study updates those findings to 2024 and explores respondents' predicted involvement in such a conflict.

methodsFindings are from Wave 3, conducted May 23-June 14, 2024; participants were members of Ipsos KnowledgePanel. All respondents to prior waves who remained in KnowledgePanel were invited to participate; to facilitate comparison with 2023 findings, this analysis is restricted to Wave 3 respondents who had responded to both Waves 1 and 2. Outcomes are expressed as weighted proportions and adjusted prevalence differences.

resultsThe Wave 3 completion rate was 88.4% overall and 91.6% for respondents to Waves 1 and 2; there were 8185 respondents in the analytic sample. After weighting, half the sample was female (50.6%, 95% CI 49.1%, 52.1%); the weighted mean (SD) age was 50.8 (16.4) years. Few respondents agreed strongly or very strongly that "in the next few years, there will be civil war in the United States" (6.5%, 95% CI 5.7%, 7.3%) or that "the United States needs a civil war to set things right" (3.6%, 95% CI 3.0%, 4.2%). These prevalences were higher among subsets of respondents previously associated with increased support for and willingness to commit political violence. Of the small minority (3.7%, 95% CI 3.1%, 4.3%) who thought it very or extremely likely that they would be combatants, 44.5% (95% CI 36.5%, 52.6%) reported that they would convert to not likely if this were urged by family members; 23-31% were open to persuasion by friends, respected religious leaders, elected officials, and the media.

conclusionsIn mid-2024, the expectation that civil war was likely and the belief that it was needed were uncommon and were unchanged from 2023. Those expecting to participate as combatants reported openness to change in response to input from many sources. These findings can help guide prevention efforts.

Indexed as

AuthoritarianismBoogaloo movementChristian nationalismCivil warDomestic violent extremismFirearm violenceMilitia movementOath keepersPolitical violenceProud boysQAnonRacismThree percentersViolence and societyWhite supremacy

Identifiers

PMID40611307
PMCPMC12225159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.