Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611272›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

Examining the unfair concentration of non-institutional deliveries among poor households in India: a study of predictors and wealth-based inequality.

Rakesh Chandra, Jeetendra Kumar Patel, Sonal Srivastava, Saradiya Mukherjee, Aditya Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rakesh ChandraSchool of Health Systems Studies, Tata Institute of Social Science, V.N. Purava Marg, Deonar, Mumbai, Mumbai, 400088, India. rakesh.chandra@tiss.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8330-9809
Jeetendra Kumar PatelDepartment of General & Applied Geography, Dr. Harisingh Gour Vishwavidyalaya, Sagar, M.P, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-0226
Sonal SrivastavaIndependent Researcher, Mumbai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5407-4131
Saradiya MukherjeeIndependent Researcher, Mumbai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5730-473X
Aditya SinghDepartment of Geography, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3031-5225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-institutional deliveries, defined as childbirth outside healthcare facilities, remain a significant global concern. It poses serious maternal and child health problems and significantly contributes to maternal and infant mortality. India witnessed a sustained decrease in non-institutional deliveries in thepast 20 years. However, the rate of decline has tapered recently while the country still has a sizeable number of women delivering out of the facility. To better understand the enduring proportions of non-institutional deliveries, this study preliminarily analyses its predictors. The prime objective of the study is to unravel the inequality in the prevalence of non-institutional deliveries and understand if they are unfairly concentrated among certain households in India. It also aims to provide policy-relevant insights into the socioeconomic factors contributing to its concentration among specific households and their implications for maternal and child health. METHODOLOGY: Using the National Family Health Survey-5 (NFHS-5) data (N = 1,75,569 deliveries), we developed a regression model to understand the existing non-institutional deliveries and their predictors. We employed the Erreygers’ Concentration Index (ECI) to quantify the degree of concentration (inequality) of non-institutional deliveries among households. Furthermore, a decomposition analysis was run to analyse the factors contributing to the concentration of non-institutional deliveries in a particular groups of households. It breaks down the overall inequality at population level into its constituent parts to identify the sources of inequality. This approach helps discover prime causes of inequality, such as differences in income, education, or other relevant factors.

findingsOut of the total sampled deliveries in the reference period, around 14% were non-institutional. Inequality analysis (ECI=-0.2174; p-value < 0.0001) suggests that non-institutional deliveries were unequally and unfairly concentrated in low-income households. The concentration of non-institutional deliveries in poor households was majorly contributed by factors like education (13.85%), wealth (13.91%), mass media exposure (12.27%) region (9.76%), birth order (3.17%), distance to health facilities (2.77%), caste (2.82%), timing of first ANC visit (1.07%), and women considering having to take transport as a problem (1.60%).

conclusionsThis research employs inequality analyses of non-institutional deliveries and contributes to the existing literature by establishing its unfair concentration among poor households in India. It expands our understanding of the factors driving non-institutional deliveries among the disadvantaged. The findings highlight the importance of targeted interventions and policies to reduce the concentration of last-mile non-institutional deliveries among vulnerable women living in marginalized households.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricHealthcare DisparitiesHome ChildbirthPovertyAdultFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaPregnancySocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultDecomposition analysisErreygers concentration index (ECI)IndiaNon-institutional deliveriesWealth-based inequality

Identifiers

PMID40611272
PMCPMC12231734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.