Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611266›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025

Vasopressin use across shock states: international insights from an international ESICM-endorsed survey: the PRESS Survey.

Mathieu Jozwiak, Vladimir L Cousin, Daniel De Backer, Manu L N G Malbrain, Xavier Monnet, Antonio Messina, Michelle S Chew, Cardiovascular Dynamics section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07453901 (The Multicentre Prospective Observational Study on the Management of Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07453901 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Multicentre Prospective Observational Study on the Management of Septic Shock (Observational Study on Septic Shock, the OSS Study)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBicetre HospitalRan2026 to 2028Enrolled5,000ConditionsSeptic Shock
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Current standard of care for septic shock.Intensive care medicine · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mathieu JozwiakService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, 151 Route Saint Antoine de Ginestière, 06200, Nice, France. jozwiak.m@chu-nice.fr.
Vladimir L CousinService de Réanimation Pédiatrique, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Daniel De BackerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, CHIREC Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Manu L N G MalbrainFirst Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Xavier MonnetService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, IHU PROMETHEUS, FHU SEPSIS, Groupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HP, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Antonio MessinaIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Mialan, Italy.
Michelle S ChewDepartment of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Cardiovascular Dynamics section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVasopressin is currently suggested as a second-line vasopressor in patients with septic shock and persistent arterial hypotension. This survey aimed to assess the current use of vasopressin and terlipressin in patients with septic shock.

methodsAn international survey endorsed by the European Society of the Intensive Care Medicine. All items addressed the different areas of uncertainty and research identified from current international recommendations. 

results1919 intensivists from 124 countries responded to the survey: 1220(64%) worked in Europe, 1430(74%) in high and upper-middle income level countries and 916(48%) in academic ICUs. Vasopressin or terlipressin were available to 1830(95%) respondents. The main reported indications were refractory septic shock, catecholamine sparing in all types of refractory shock, refractory vasoplegic shock (other than septic) without reduced left ventricular systolic function and septic shock with high cardiac output and low systemic vascular resistance (73%,53%,51% and 49% of respondents, respectively). The main reported contraindications were non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia and digital or skin ischemia. Overall, 1506(78%) respondents used vasopressin or terlipressin, 93% of them as a second-line vasopressor after initial resuscitation, mainly to increase blood pressure and reduce the catecholamine load. The dose of norepinephrine alone or the duration of norepinephrine administration alone triggered vasopressin and terlipressin initiation for 98% and 53% of respondents, respectively: the most frequent dose of norepinephrine base was 0.25-0.50 µg/kg/min and the most frequent duration was > 2-6 h. The combination of the dose of norepinephrine base and the duration of its administration triggered vasopressin and terlipressin initiation for 78% of respondents, the most frequent combination being a norepinephrine base dose > 0.25 or > 0.50 µg/kg/min for > 2-6 h. An initial dose of vasopressin of 0.01 or 0.03 U/min was used by 50% of respondents. The mean arterial pressure level triggered the tapering of vasopressin or terlipressin for 88% of respondents. Discontinuation started after the dose of the first-line vasopressor had been lowered below a predefined threshold for 43% of respondents and was progressive for 89% of respondents.

conclusionsVasopressin is commonly used to treat patients with septic shock, but its handling (doses and discontinuation practices) remains heterogeneous, indicating the need for guidance in its clinical use.

Indexed as

ShockShock, SepticVasopressinsEuropeHumansIntensive Care UnitsLypressinSurveys and QuestionnairesTerlipressinVasoconstrictor AgentsLypressinTerlipressinVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsDecatecholaminizationNorepinephrineSeptic shockTerlipressinVasopressinVasopressor loadVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID40611266
PMCPMC12231731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.