Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611259›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2025

Exploring client perspectives: a qualitative study on how families experience (blended) forensic outpatient systemic therapy for juvenile antisocial behavior.

S Marjolein van Cappellen, Hanneke E Creemers, Larissa Hoogsteder, Jessica J Asscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S Marjolein van CappellenDepartment of Clinical Child & Family Studies, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80140, Utrecht, 3584 CS, the Netherlands. s.m.vancappellen@uu.nl.
Hanneke E CreemersFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15776, Amsterdam, 1011 NG, the Netherlands.
Larissa HoogstederFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15776, Amsterdam, 1011 NG, the Netherlands.
Jessica J AsscherDepartment of Clinical Child & Family Studies, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80140, Utrecht, 3584 CS, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 60-63600-98-11138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterventions aimed at juveniles exhibiting challenging antisocial behavior often face motivation issues, high drop-out rates, and difficulties in achieving substantial and long-lasting effects. Gaining insight into how families experience these interventions may be a crucial step in obtaining more understanding of what does and does not work for clients in forensic youth care. The current study investigated the experiences of juveniles and caregivers with Forensic Outpatient Systemic Therapy (FAST), an intensive intervention aiming to reduce juvenile antisocial behavior. The study examined how juveniles and caregivers evaluated FAST in terms of the process of setting treatment goals, helpful components, points of improvement, their therapist, and a blended version of FAST (FASTb) that is partially offered online.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted after treatment termination with 24 participants from 16 families (9 juveniles, 15 caregivers) who participated in a randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of FAST. A purposive sampling method was used to yield a diverse sample and varied experiences. Thematic analysis was performed in three phases.

resultsTreatment goals were generally set collaboratively and agreement was often achieved, but juveniles were not always involved in setting the treatment goals or in treatment in general. Evaluations of FAST's success were varied but generally positive. Most helpful treatment components were conversations with the therapist and, to caregivers, program specific components. Although most participants evaluated their therapist positively, some reported the need for more responsivity. FASTb increased treatment accessibility for some caregivers, but most participants preferred face-to-face appointments.

conclusionsThis study provides insight into how FAST is perceived and factors influencing engagement, yielding several clinical implications for systemic treatment in forensic youth care. First, building a strong therapeutic alliance is important. Juveniles benefit from a kind, activity-based approach, whereas caregivers value therapist empathy. Given the severity of antisocial behavior in FAST's target group, initial safety interventions may be necessary before being able to invest in the therapeutic alliance. Second, therapists should persist in engaging juveniles, for instance, by incorporating (physical) activities. Third, blended care may improve accessibility. Therefore, it is important to discuss its potential with families throughout treatment.

Indexed as

Antisocial behaviorBlended careForensic outpatient systemic therapy (FAST)Intervention evaluationQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40611259
PMCPMC12225379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.