ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Distance caregiving using smart home technologies: balancing ethical priorities in family decision-making by only children.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe parallel growth of population ageing and international migration have introduced a unique population of transnational caregivers in elder care. Particularly for only children who face conflicting obligations and reduced caregiving resources, smart home devices could be technical tools to care for older parents from a distance. Research towards the use of these technologies has unearthed ethical issues such as privacy, autonomy, stigma and beneficence, but has not been fully explored in distance care. In this paper, we explore the ethical issues expressed by a group of only children towards integrating assistive, monitoring, and robotic technologies in their transnational care plans.
methodsPurposive snowball sampling was used for the recruitment of 26 distance caregivers aged between 28 and 45, who were their parent's only children. They lived in Europe for at least 5 years, with at least one parent residing in the home country. In semi-structured interviews, participants discussed the ethical issues of wearable devices, ambient and visual remote monitoring technologies, as well as the possible use of one assistive robot in the context of distance caregiving for older parents. We used the applied thematic analysis methodology to analyze the data.
resultsWe highlight two ethical considerations. First, participants saw the need for maximizing good outcomes in caring for their older parents and fulfilling their responsibilities to ensure their health and safety, balanced against the respect for the parents' autonomy, dignity, and privacy. Second, they weighed the benefits and harms of technologies at a distance to provide companionship and support against the intrinsic value placed on care received from one's only child.
conclusionsDiscussions to involve technologies in elder care at a distance prompted complex decision-making processes to balance, weigh, and rationalize their ethical concerns as foreseen by the caregivers. The importance of maximizing the health and safety of older parents came at an unavoidable cost of the respect to autonomy, privacy, and dignity. Participants valued their own emotional connection and relationship to their parents, which they prioritized above the instrumental value of technological support. We further discuss our findings within the ethics of care theory and concepts within transnational care literature to make sense of the broader ethical implications of this empirical study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.