ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Keyword-optimized template insertion for clinical note classification via prompt-based learning.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Domain-specific versus general large language models: a review and empirical benchmark in real medical texts.Scientific reports · 2026Review
- The AIR·MS data platform for artificial intelligence in healthcare.JAMIA open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrompt-based learning involves the additions of prompts (i.e., templates) to the input of pre-trained large language models (PLMs) to adapt them to specific tasks with minimal training. This technique is particularly advantageous in clinical scenarios where the amount of annotated data is limited. This study aims to investigate the impact of template position on model performance and training efficiency in clinical note classification tasks using prompt-based learning, especially in zero- and few-shot settings.
methodsWe developed a keyword-optimized template insertion method (KOTI) to enhance model performance by strategically placing prompt templates near relevant clinical information within the notes. The method involves defining task-specific keywords, identifying sentences containing these keywords, and inserting the prompt template in their vicinity. We compared KOTI with standard template insertion (STI) methods in which the template is directly appended at the end of the input text. Specifically, we compared STI with naïve tail-truncation (STI-s) and STI with keyword-optimized input truncation (STI-k). Experiments were conducted using two pre-trained encoder models, GatorTron and ClinicalBERT, and two decoder models, BioGPT and ClinicalT5, across five classification tasks, including dysmenorrhea, peripheral vascular disease, depression, osteoarthritis, and smoking status classification.
resultsOur experiments revealed that the KOTI approach consistently outperformed both STI-s and STI-k in zero-shot and few-shot scenarios for encoder models, with KOTI yielding a significant 24% F1 improvement over STI-k for GatorTron and 8% for Clinical BERT. Additionally, training with balanced examples further enhanced performance, particularly under few-shot conditions. In contrast, decoder-based models exhibited inconsistent results, with KOTI showing significant improvement in F1 score over STI-k for BioGPT (+19%), but a significant drop for ClinicalT5 (-18%), suggesting that KOTI is not beneficial across all transformer model architectures.
conclusionOur findings underscore the significance of template position in prompt-based fine-tuning of encoder models and highlights KOTI's potential to optimize real-world clinical note classification tasks with few training examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.