Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611192›Full record

SynthesisBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025

Psychodrama: implementation, study design and effectiveness: a systematic review.

Jesús Maya, Miriam Pérez-Berbel, Laura Giraldo-Arroyave, Irene Hurtado

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jesús MayaUniversidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain. jmmaya@uloyola.es.
Miriam Pérez-BerbelUniversidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.
Laura Giraldo-ArroyaveUniversidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.
Irene HurtadoUniversidad Loyola Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychodrama is a psychotherapy model in which action-focused techniques are used to improve the quality of life of patients. A systematic review of the psychodrama interventions published between 2018 and 2022 is carried out in order to recognize the implementation of psychodrama (population, objectives, theoretical model, modality, intensity, periodicity, duration of sessions, psychodramatic techniques, and sistematization); to analyze the methodological design for evaluating the impact of psychodrama interventions (study design and RCT); and to consider the results of the effectiveness of psychodrama.

methodFollowing the PRISMA declaration protocol, 27 indexed studies have been selected in three databases: PsycINFO, Scopus and Medline. The selected articles met the following inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed papers, written in English, empirical studies, including quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods research, corresponding to interventions or treatments based on psychodrama and evaluating the effectiveness of the interventions with 10 participants in pretest-posttest.

resultsIn relation to the implementation, psychodrama was applied in a group format with diverse population, especially adolescents and adults, and most of the interventions were implemented weekly (8-13 sessions) and lasted approximately two hours. Generally, these interventions were based on Morenian Psychodrama. Role reversal, doubling and mirror were the techniques most used. No manualized psychodrama treatments were reported. In relation to study design, 62% were evaluated using a quantitative design, 27% with mixed methods, and 11% with a qualitative evaluation. 26% included follow-up assessment. The number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is low (11%), mostly detecting quasi-experimental controlled studies (48%) and single group studies (40%). In relation to the effectiveness of psychodrama, positive and significant results were found, for example, in the reduction of post-traumatic stress levels, the empowerment of women in vulnerable situations, improvement in the quality of life and symptoms of patients with schizophrenia, or improvement in antisocial behavior in adolescents. In 40% of the studies, effect sizes were reported, which were typically medium or large. However, the sample size was small for drawing solid conclusions. 22% of the studies did not find significant changes in any dimension. No iatrogenic effects were found.

conclusionsThis data supports the implementation of Morenian Psychodrama in group format across a wide variety of populations, although there are no clear profiles that have a greater impact. However, the methodological design of psychodrama needs improvement: RCTs and quasi-experimental designs, larger sample sizes, follow-up evaluations, and effect size measurement. Additionally, structuring interventions and their manualization in specific populations can help establish evidence-based treatments.

Indexed as

PsychodramaHumansQuality of LifeResearch DesignEffectivenessPsychodramaPsychotherapyRCTStudy designSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40611192
PMCPMC12224369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.