ArticleBMC oral health2025
Comparison of residual stress distribution between root-analogue implant and threaded cylindrical implant.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fatigue Behavior of Dental Implants Affected by Peri-Implantitis-Related Bone Loss: Influence of Implantoplasty Evaluated Through In Vitro Testing and Finite Element Modeling.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Animal experiment on osseointegration of porous titanium root analogue implants with composite CSn-TAK242 coating.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study compares the residual stress distribution and stress-release deformation of root-analogue implants (RAIs) and traditional threaded cylindrical implants to assess their clinical applicability and optimization.
methodsThree implant types (solid RAIs, mesh RAIs, and traditional threaded implants) were analyzed using contour cutting and finite element analysis to evaluate stress distribution and deformation trends after stress release.
resultsRAIs exhibited lower tensile and compressive stresses than threaded implants (T1: 26 MPa vs. 48 MPa, T2: 18 MPa vs. 74 MPa), but showed greater displacement (T1: 0.02 mm, T2: 0.012 mm, T3: 0.0025 mm), mainly in the apical region.
conclusionsRAIs offer advantages in stress distribution but require further optimization to address deformation. Future research should focus on improving material selection and manufacturing processes to enhance implant stability and long-term success. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.