Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611141›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

A participatory framework for identifying and ranking multidimensional solutions to nutritional behavior issues in female school students: a stakeholder-based mixed-methods study.

Nasrin Mehrjoyan, Fatemeh Zarei, Fazlollah Ghofranipour, Fazlollah Ahmadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nasrin MehrjoyanDepartment of Health Education & Health Promotion, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box: 14115-111, Tehran Jalal AleAhmad Nasr, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8452-4375
Fatemeh ZareiDepartment of Health Education & Health Promotion, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box: 14115-111, Tehran Jalal AleAhmad Nasr, Tehran, Iran. f.zarei@modares.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1561-3646
Fazlollah GhofranipourDepartment of Health Education & Health Promotion, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, P.O. Box: 14115-111, Tehran Jalal AleAhmad Nasr, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2338-230X
Fazlollah AhmadiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-7735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBroad multisectoral collaboration among families, communities, schools, health services, and policymakers is essential for improving nutritional behaviors. Despite the increasing prevalence of poor dietary habits among adolescent girls, existing interventions often fail to address the complex social, cultural, and environmental determinants of nutritional behavior. This study aimed to develop a proposed solution to improve the nutritional behaviors of female school students aged 13-17 years in Khuzestan, Iran.

methodsThis study employed a mixed-methodology approach, integrating qualitative exploration and stakeholder-driven prioritization. Phase 1 utilized directed qualitative inquiry with 17 school students to identify adolescent dietary challenges, while Phase 2 applied the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize solutions through expert consensus and multicriteria evaluation. The AHP framework, which is supported by Expert Choice software, ensures rigorous weight assignment (CR < 0.1) as validated by independent expert review.

resultsIn Phase 1, directed content analysis of 17 student interviews yielded six overarching themes (e.g., "Self-Monitoring and Goal Setting," "Social Environmental Influences") and 15 subthemes, from which 121 candidate solutions were generated. During Phase 2, nine panelists (five nutrition experts and four stakeholders) applied the NGT: 74.4% (90/121) of the solutions met the ≥ 4.0 mean ranking threshold (on a 5-point scale), while 25.6% (31/121) were eliminated. The 90 retained solutions were then scored via the AHP across five criteria-effectiveness, feasibility, cost efficiency, sustainability, and cultural acceptability. Cultural acceptability received the highest weight (35.7%), followed by sustainability (18.1%), cost efficiency (20.2%), effectiveness (16.8%), and feasibility (12.1%). The consistency was excellent (CR = 0.003), and sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of the rank order under ± 15% weight variation.

conclusionThis stakeholder-driven framework highlighted balanced diet education during puberty, parental education sessions, and school nutrition campaigns as top-priority interventions, demonstrating excellent consistency (CR = 0.003). Future studies should pilot and rigorously evaluate these interventions in real-world school settings, assess their long-term impacts on dietary behaviors and health outcomes, analyze cost-effectiveness, and explore digital delivery platforms to increase adolescent engagement.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorHealth PromotionStakeholder ParticipationStudentsAdolescentFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicIranQualitative ResearchAdolescent NutritionAnalytic Hierarchy ProcessFemale School StudentsMixed-Methods StudyNominal Group TechniqueStakeholder Engagement

Identifiers

PMID40611141
PMCPMC12225208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.