Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611064›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Quality assessment of youth mental health policies in China based on the policy modelling consistency index model.

Hao-Yu Yuan, Jia-Lin Zhao, Yu-Lian Zhang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hao-Yu YuanCollege of Philosophy, Law and Political Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China. 1914160844@qq.com.
Jia-Lin ZhaoCollege of Philosophy, Law and Political Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.
Yu-Lian ZhangCollege of Philosophy, Law and Political Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was initiated due to a critical need to explore the inadequately addressed quality of mental health policies for youth in China. With increasing concerns over the mental health of young people, it is imperative to assess the strengths and weaknesses of these policies to suggest significant improvements.

methodsEmploying ROSTCM 6.0 text mining and ATLAS.ti qualitative analysis software, we developed a quality assessment framework based on the Policy Modelling Consistency (PMC) index model. This framework comprises 9 primary and 44 secondary variables, allowing policies to be classified into different levels based on PMC scores, facilitating detailed evaluation of each policy. The policies selected for this study span the period from 2012 to 2023.

resultsOur comprehensive review began with 937 documents, eventually narrowed down to 21 key policy texts following a meticulous three-stage screening process. The results indicated a predominance of high-quality policies. The policies demonstrated strengths in areas such as comprehensiveness, inclusiveness, and the breadth of objectives. However, notable weaknesses were observed in aspects like inter-organizational cooperation, responsiveness, and the efficiency of information-gathering tools.

conclusionsThe study concludes that enhancing cross-sectoral collaboration, expediting policy response times, and refining tools for information collection can significantly improve the impact and timeliness of interventions for youth mental health in China.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMental HealthMental Health ServicesQuality Assurance, Health CareAdolescentChinaHumansModels, TheoreticalChinaPMC index modelPolicy quality assessmentTextual analysisYouth mental health

Identifiers

PMID40611064
PMCPMC12224512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.