ArticleBMC public health2025
Assessment of water handling practices in households and related health impacts: a case study in Deyniile District, Mogadishu, Somalia.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Household Water Security, Hygienic Handling Practices, and Fecal Contamination: A Mediation Analysis From Wenago District, Gedeo Zone, South Ethiopia.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Climate Variability, Urbanization, Water Insecurity, and Cholera in Somalia (2000-2025): A Thematic Narrative Review.Environmental health insights · 2026Review
- Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Risk Factors of Enteric Bacterial Infections Among Children Under Five in Nairobi County, Kenya.International journal of microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccess to safe drinking water and adequate sanitation is essential for maintaining public health. This study investigates water collection, treatment practices, perceptions of water safety, and their health impacts within a community. Understanding these aspects is crucial for developing interventions to enhance water safety and health outcomes.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 360 households in the community and the study subjects were selected randomly from these households. Data was collected through a survey conducted in 360 households, focusing on water collection methods, types of containers, water treatment practices, and sanitation and hygiene behaviors, perceptions of water safety, and the health effects of unsafe water. Descriptive statistics was applied to analyze the frequency and percentage distributions of the variables using SPSS version 20.0.
resultsThe most common containers for water collection were jerricans (44.2%) and plastic containers (38.6%). While 74.7% of the containers were covered, a notable portion remained uncovered (25.3%). Although 72.8% of respondents believed their water was safe to drink, only 58.1% of the respondents treated their water. Boiling was the most common water treatment method (36.3%), followed by filtration (31.1%) and chemical treatment (30.6%). The primary reasons for not treating water (n = 151) included the belief that water was already clean (62 respondents, 41.1%) and lack of knowledge about water treatment (60 respondents, 39.7%). There was a major recognition of the health effects of unsafe water, with 38.3% associating it with diarrhea and 30.3% with cholera. However, 47.5% did not link water quality to health, indicating gaps in knowledge. The majority of households used toilets (76.9%), but open defecation (13.9%) and improper waste disposal practices, such as disposing of wastewater into open drains (37.5%), were prevalent. Most households consumed more than 20 L of water daily (63.6%), with monthly expenditures on water varying widely. While 40.6% of households spent $1–5 per month on water, a small but major portion faced higher costs.
conclusionsThe study reveals that the community is aware of the importance of water safety and sanitation, but faces challenges in consistent water treatment and wastewater disposal. There is a need for enhanced awareness and education on the health risks of untreated water and support for affordable treatment methods. Improving sanitation infrastructure and providing equitable access to safe drinking water are critical for better health outcomes. Policy interventions and community engagement are essential to address these issues and ensure sustainable water safety practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.