Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40611046›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Assessment of water handling practices in households and related health impacts: a case study in Deyniile District, Mogadishu, Somalia.

Mohamed Hassan Mohamed, Hardeep Rai Sharma, Predrag Ilić, Yahye Elmi, Abdikarim Abdi Adam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed Hassan MohamedFaculty of Health Science, Department of Public & Environmental Health, Somali International University, Mogadishu, Somalia. tacshiir@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0756-1225
Hardeep Rai SharmaInstitute of Environmental Studies, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, Haryana, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-5205
Predrag IlićInstitute for Protection and Ecology of the Republic of Srpska, Republic of Srpska, Vidovdanska 43, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Yahye ElmiFaculty of Health Science, Department Medical Lab, Somali International University (SIU), Mogadishu, Somalia.
Abdikarim Abdi AdamDepartment of Public Health, Federal Ministry of Health and Human Service, Mogadishu, Somalia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to safe drinking water and adequate sanitation is essential for maintaining public health. This study investigates water collection, treatment practices, perceptions of water safety, and their health impacts within a community. Understanding these aspects is crucial for developing interventions to enhance water safety and health outcomes.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 360 households in the community and the study subjects were selected randomly from these households. Data was collected through a survey conducted in 360 households, focusing on water collection methods, types of containers, water treatment practices, and sanitation and hygiene behaviors, perceptions of water safety, and the health effects of unsafe water. Descriptive statistics was applied to analyze the frequency and percentage distributions of the variables using SPSS version 20.0.

resultsThe most common containers for water collection were jerricans (44.2%) and plastic containers (38.6%). While 74.7% of the containers were covered, a notable portion remained uncovered (25.3%). Although 72.8% of respondents believed their water was safe to drink, only 58.1% of the respondents treated their water. Boiling was the most common water treatment method (36.3%), followed by filtration (31.1%) and chemical treatment (30.6%). The primary reasons for not treating water (n  = 151) included the belief that water was already clean (62 respondents, 41.1%) and lack of knowledge about water treatment (60 respondents, 39.7%). There was a major recognition of the health effects of unsafe water, with 38.3% associating it with diarrhea and 30.3% with cholera. However, 47.5% did not link water quality to health, indicating gaps in knowledge. The majority of households used toilets (76.9%), but open defecation (13.9%) and improper waste disposal practices, such as disposing of wastewater into open drains (37.5%), were prevalent. Most households consumed more than 20 L of water daily (63.6%), with monthly expenditures on water varying widely. While 40.6% of households spent $1–5 per month on water, a small but major portion faced higher costs.

conclusionsThe study reveals that the community is aware of the importance of water safety and sanitation, but faces challenges in consistent water treatment and wastewater disposal. There is a need for enhanced awareness and education on the health risks of untreated water and support for affordable treatment methods. Improving sanitation infrastructure and providing equitable access to safe drinking water are critical for better health outcomes. Policy interventions and community engagement are essential to address these issues and ensure sustainable water safety practices.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeWater PurificationWater SupplyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansHygieneMaleSanitationDrinking WaterCommunity perceptionsDeyniile districtHealth impactsHousehold water managementPublic healthSanitationWaterborne diseasesWater safetyWater treatment

Identifiers

PMID40611046
PMCPMC12225094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.