ArticleBMC public health2025
A comparison of modifiable risk factors for dementia among South Asian migrants and non-migrants aged 50 or older in Tasmania, Australia.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Dementia risk among individuals with a migrant background-a scoping review.Frontiers in dementia · 2025Pooled it
- Hearing Loss and Modifiable Dementia Risk Factors in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older Living in Tasmania, Australia.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSouth Asian migrants are one of the fastest-growing populations in Australia, particularly in the southern island state of Tasmania. However, there is limited research evaluating their modifiable dementia risk factors. This study aimed to fill this gap by comparing risk factors in South Asian migrants to non-migrant Australians in Tasmania.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 136 South Asian migrants and 2743 non-migrant Australians aged 50 or older residing in Tasmania. Participants completed a survey questionnaire. Logistic regression models were used to assess differences in the odds of reporting modifiable dementia risk factors between the two cohorts as they responded to a survey.
resultsSouth Asian migrants had higher odds of reporting hypertension (OR, 5.5; 95% CI, 3.5 to 8.4; p < 0.001), hypercholesterolaemia (OR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.3 to 6.4; p < 0.001), cognitive inactivity (OR, 16.9; 95% CI, 10.4 to 28.9; p < 0.001), diabetes (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 3.5 to 7.6; p < 0.001), smoking (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.7 to 7.1; p < 0.001) and nonadherence to a Mediterranean-type diet (OR, 7.4; 95% CI, 3.5 to 18.9; p < 0.001), compared to non-migrant Australians. However, South Asian migrants had lower odds of reporting alcohol consumption (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.43; p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe risk profiles were different between South Asian migrants and non-migrant Australians, highlighting the need for targeted interventions addressing group-specific risk factors. However, the use of convenience sampling for the South Asian migrant group may limit the representativeness of the findings and affect their generalizability. However, the use of convenience sampling and the relatively small sample size of the South Asian migrant group may limit the representativeness and generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the South Asian migrant group may represent a more socioeconomically disadvantaged population compared to the non-migrant sample, which may be relatively healthier and more financially advantaged than the general Tasmanian population. The study highlights the need for targeted, culturally appropriate interventions to address these risks. Further research is needed to comprehensively assess the prevalence and determinants of modifiable dementia risk factors among South Asian migrants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.