ArticleBMC public health2025
Evaluation of the Early Years South Australia mobile application.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReleased in July 2023 by the Office for Early Child Development in South Australia (SA), the Early Years SA mobile app supports parents of children aged 0-5 years with features including health check reminders, developmental milestone information, and a broad range of parenting resources. This study evaluated user awareness, engagement, and overall experience to identify areas for improvement and enhance the app's impact on child health outcomes in SA.
methodsThe app was promoted through state-wide campaigns, including social media, parenting expos, and healthcare professional referrals, with an estimated eligible population of ~ 52,000 families with children aged 0-5 years in SA. Participants were app users and parents/caregivers of children aged 0-5 years in SA. A mixed-methods approach included four sub-studies: (1) Analysis of app usage statistics; (2) Usability evaluation via the System Usability Scale survey; (3) Assessment of app awareness and behaviour change through a population-level survey; and (4) Qualitative feedback from semi-structured interviews and an in-person focus group.
resultsIn its first year, the app attracted 16,411 downloads and 12,289 users, with 4,272 active users in July 2024. The most accessed pages related to newborn sleep, immunisations, and early feeding. The System Usability Scale (n = 415) scored 82.5/100, indicating "excellent" usability. Population survey data (n = 324) showed 17% of South Australian parents of 0-5-year-olds were aware of the app, and among users, 17% reported it influenced their decision to access child health checks and immunisations. Qualitative feedback (n = 17) highlighted appreciation for the app's user-friendly layout, credible Australian-focused information, and convenient, age-based resources as a digital companion to the My Health and Development Record (Blue Book). Suggested improvements included clarifying age-specific content organisation, adding comprehensive feeding and sleep tracking, and incorporating content for diverse family structures, cultural backgrounds, and neurodivergence.
conclusionThe Early Years SA app shows strong usability and early evidence of positively influencing health service use. Future improvements should aim to expand reach and enrich content while preserving its user-friendly design. This evaluation offers baseline data for continued monitoring of awareness, usage, and impact on child health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.