ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in full-term pregnancies of very advanced maternal age: a Japanese single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The quintessential high-risk profile: advanced management strategies for placenta accreta spectrum in patients with advanced maternal age and IVF conception.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced maternal age (AMA), defined as pregnancy in people aged ≥ 35 years, is associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Although the outcomes of AMA pregnancies have been reported, detailed information on the specific outcomes in pregnant individuals aged ≥ 45 years, particularly those reaching full term, remains limited. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the perinatal outcomes of full-term pregnant individuals aged ≥ 45 years.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study involving full-term pregnant individuals aged ≥ 35 years who attempted vaginal delivery at our facility between January 2019 and December 2023. Participants were categorized into the AMA (35-39 years, n = 947), moderate AMA (40-44 years, n = 387), and very AMA (≥ 45 years, n = 34) groups. The primary outcomes included maternal outcomes, such as intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) rate and indications, blood loss, and additional interventions (e.g., uterine artery embolization [UAE]). Secondary outcomes included neonatal outcomes such as birth weight, Apgar score, umbilical artery pH, need for respiratory support, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission within 24 h of birth.
resultsThe intrapartum CD rate increased significantly with age (AMA: 17.0%, moderate AMA: 27.1%, very AMA: 35.3%; p < 0.01). However, more than half of the deliveries were vaginal, even in the very AMA group. No significant differences in intrapartum CD indications were found between the groups. The amount of blood loss was significantly higher in the moderate AMA group than in the other groups (p < 0.001). UAE and cesarean hysterectomy incidences showed no significant differences across the groups (p = 0.52 and p = 0.78, respectively). Regarding neonatal outcomes, no significant differences in birth weight were observed, along with low Apgar score, low umbilical artery pH, need for respiratory support, or NICU admission within 24 h of birth between the groups (p = 0.61, p = 0.62, p = 0.52, p = 1.00, and p = 0.44, respectively).
conclusionsAlthough the risk of intrapartum CD increases in pregnant individuals aged ≥ 45 years, those delivering at full term have neonatal outcomes similar to those of younger AMA pregnancies. Importantly, nearly two-thirds of this cohort achieved vaginal delivery. This information may be helpful for consultations with pregnant individuals aged ≥ 45 years in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.