ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Dietary intake and five types of mental disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMental illness has been presenting serious public health concerns. Studies have linked mental disorders to poor dietary patterns. The study aimed to estimate the causal relationship between dietary macronutrient intake and mental disorders using a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.
methodsThe causal relationships between dietary macronutrient intake (i.e., carbohydrate, fat, protein and sugar) and mental disorders (i.e., anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, neuroticism and schizophrenia) were explored on the basis of UK Biobank and 5 datasets. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and weighted median (WM) methods were applied to calculate the potential causation between macronutrient and mental disorders. MR-Egger's intercept and MR-PRESSO approaches were used to verify the MR assumptions. Outcomes were reported as odds ratios (OR) and regression coefficients (β), which were adjusted by False Discovery Rate (FDR) corrections.
resultsForward MR analyses revealed that genetically predicted high-fat and high-protein intakes were related to an increased risk of anxiety [fat: OR = 3.103, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.015 to 9.486, P
conclusionsOur findings demonstrated that although the effects of psychiatric diseases on diet patterns have been well understood, the potential impacts of dietary intake on mental disorders are needed to be highlighted. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.