Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610974›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Beyond companionship: psycho-social benefits of pet ownership.

Jing Zhao, Mohammad Javad Koohsari, Jiuling Li, Yufeng Luo, Andrew T Kaczynski, Gavin R McCormack, Koichiro Oka, Tomoya Hanibuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jing ZhaoSchool of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China. zhaojing@gzhu.edu.cn.
Mohammad Javad KoohsariSchool of Advanced Science and Technology, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan.
Jiuling LiSchool of Advanced Science and Technology, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan.
Yufeng LuoSchool of Advanced Science and Technology, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan.
Andrew T KaczynskiDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Gavin R McCormackDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Koichiro OkaFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, Japan.
Tomoya HanibuchiGraduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundations Scheme Grant FDN-154331Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP17H00947Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP23K09701JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research program JP20H04113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPet ownership, which has increased over the last decade, can offer owners health benefits. However, relatively few studies have examined the psycho-social benefits of pet ownership, particularly across diverse contexts and types of pets. Existing research is largely Western-focused, and has paid limited attention to the potential interrelationships between pet ownership, pet types, and gender. This study planned to examine associations between various categories of pet ownership and multiple psycho-social benefits in a sample of adults from Japan.

methodA cross-sectional design was applied to investigate and analyze pet species and psycho-social health outcomes. Data were collected via an online survey conducted in 21 major Japanese cities during October to November 2020. Four pet ownership categories were analyzed: "non-pet", "dog", "other pet", and "dog and other pet". Gender-stratified multivariable linear regression models were applied to explore the associations between psycho-social health outcomes and pet ownership categories for both men and women.

resultsA total of 8,821 participants were included in analysis. The results showed owning both dogs and other pets was associated with higher neighborhood place attachment and social capital for both men and women. For men, owning other pets (excluding dogs) was positively associated with higher neighborhood place attachment and social capital. Dog ownership was also positively associated with social capital, but not neighborhood place attachment, regardless of gender.

conclusionsThe findings highlight the psycho-social benefits of both single-dog and multi-pet ownership, suggesting their potential for fostering health and social well-being. More research is needed to examine the contributions of specific multi-pet and single-dog ownership and the pathways by which pet ownership contribute to health and well-being.

Indexed as

OwnershipPetsSocial CapitalAdultAgedAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesDogsFemaleHuman-Animal BondHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedResidence CharacteristicsSurveys and QuestionnairesDog ownershipHappinessNeighborhood place attachmentSocial capital

Identifiers

PMID40610974
PMCPMC12224451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.